The Superior Court of California just ruled that the Christian dating website Christian Mingle, along with Sparks Networks (the parent company that also owns several other faith based dating sites) must allow an option for same sex couples to mingle, too. It’s the same as forcing a Christian baker to bake a cake for a gay wedding. The government sets a dangerous precedent when it forces a private company to contract with another individual against their will for whatever reason. But it's also just a regular old attack on Christians complete with the usual media double standard.The media treats Christian dating websites as places rife with lonely weirdos living double lives.Yet, Muslim-targeted dating websites are treated as an innovative way for young Muslims to live their truth in the new millennium. But, if it was the Council of Muslime whatever that “demanded” this after making a special committee ruling then the said committee should be requested to “Tightly Roll Their Official Agenda Ruling” and stuff it up the old prayer flag.
Online dating services allow users to become "members" by creating a profile and uploading personal information including (but not limited to) age, gender, sexual orientation, location, and appearance.But the new search function likely won’t prove very useful to gay men or women — the site now lets them view profiles of the same gender, but does not specifically show them fellow gay users.“My sense is that a fair number of gay Christians will probably not be interested simply because they’re not interested in giving money to a company that has to be forced by the courts to serve them,” Gay Christian Network Executive Director Justin Lee said.Yes, liberal indoctrination does involve gay indoctrination, but it doesn’t have to be this way and always remember to attack the liberal, not the gay. “If your mission is to provide a Christian dating site, then the individual interpretations should rest in the individuals’ hands.” Go show where the Bible says faggotry is acceptable. So, what needs to start happening from those of a reasonable political persuasion (right, centre, and those few remaining on the left) is a counter case for every one of these ludicrous lawsuits / demands.If a social or legal precedent is made in one instance (like Christians forced to serve homosexuals), then we need to ensure the ‘full context’ of that decision is brought to bear on society (e.g.